Standards

More Submission Options for Authors with Ingest Service

Authors often take advantage of various tools to prepare their manuscript and supplemental files prior to submission to a scholarly journal. Such manuscript preparation services include language polishing, journal selection assistance, bibliography management, and collaborative authoring solutions – all providing great benefits to Authors. For example, a newly released report from Editage, an Aries partner,Read More

Saving Author and Reviewer Time with Transfer Options

Upon manuscript rejection, Authors often must duplicate the submission process on one or more subsequent journals. Additionally, Reviewers often face the issue of repeating reviews for the same content if re-selected again. Both contribute to a great loss of time and effort for researchers, deceasing user satisfaction and reducing the likelihood (and willingness) to resubmitRead More

Efficient Technologies: Our Favorite Aries Innovations

Aries Systems is committed to continued innovation and process improvements in order to maintain our standard of delivering excellence. Our workflow management systems, Editorial Manager® (EM) and ProduXion Manager® (PM), are frequently enhanced with numerous new software releases each year. To ensure our solutions meet customer needs, incorporate industry trends, adhere to technical standards, andRead More

Introduction to LiXuid Manuscript: Why XML?

What is LiXuid Manuscript™? Aries Systems’ LiXuid Manuscript™ innovation embodies our strategic vision for the future of scholarly publishing, in which XML is leveraged to streamline the entire publishing process. LiXuid Manuscript is a revolutionary feature comprised of a suite of XML workflow tools designed to work within Editorial Manager® (EM) and ProduXion Manager® (PM),Read More

Aries Celebrates Peer Review Week

The fourth annual Peer Review Week will run from September 10-15th. This year the event’s focus is Diversity and Inclusion in Peer Review. To celebrate Peer Review Week, we’ve curated a list of our favorite Editorial Manager tools and integrations that support peer review by ensuring that all participants in the peer review process receive recognition for their efforts in an unbiased way–disambiguating Author, Reviewer, and Editor contributions on a granular level.

Spring 2018 Innovation Update

Hoping to be more efficient this spring? Want to save time during peer review? Try these recent innovations to streamline your journal workflow. Simplify Author Submission with Xtract Editorial Manager Xtract saves Authors’ time by pre-populating metadata fields using data from their submitted Word manuscript file, reducing the time it takes to complete the submissionRead More

A cache for CRediT

CRediT is a standard taxonomy used to identify author contributions to a manuscript such as “writing,” “data curation,” and “conceptualization.” The taxonomy is being rapidly adopted by journals and publishers including Cell Press, PLOS and the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. The CRediT taxonomy is now formally supported in the latest version of JATSRead More