What are users saying about Editorial Manager?

Diary of an Editorial Manager User
Runtime
4:08

  • “Operating a Journal Office without Editorial Manager would be like baking bread without yeast. I just do not know how you would get anywhere without it!”

    – Jackie Lynch, Senior Editorial Coordinator, The Laryngoscope

  • “We chose Editorial Manager because it is a worldwide market leader, and we wanted a manuscript submission and editorial office system that has been proven to work well. The fact that the system has been broadly used by other publishing houses gave us confidence that some of our authors and editors would already have experience with Editorial Manager, and that training would be easy for those who did not.”

    – Wolfgang Böttner, Section Manager Medicine & Sciences and Board Member, Walter de Gruyter Publishing

  • “Editorial Manager is a versatile and powerful system that saves us time throughout the peer review process. We are extremely happy with the flexibility, responsiveness of Aries to user suggestions, and the online help feature in EM.”

    – Sara Tiner, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

  • “Editorial Manager is for us an ingenious solution because it offers us an excellent mix of pre-configured functionality and individual adaptation. We handle our journals rather individually to the benefit of authors, referees and editors and, therefore, particularly appreciate the capability in Editorial Manager allowing us to configure all these conditions ourselves within the system exactly according to our requirements.”

    – Angelika Sperlich, Oldenbourg

  • “Aries is committed to providing an excellent and ever-expanding product.”

    – Nancy J. Kriigel, Managing Editor, American Journal of Surgical Pathology

“Author Status Link: We include our copyright language with author verification, so this is an easy way for us to quickly confirm our copyright agreements.”

– Lisa Reckmeyer, American Journal of Roentgenology

“PM provides us the flexibility needed to manage a wide variety of journal workflows and keep pace with new initiatives and industry innovations.”

– Naomi Ullman, Wolters Kluwer Health

“EM makes it easy to see the history of a manuscript and keep all the correspondence in one place.”

– Annie Gering, RTI Press

“The networking and learning at EMUG is invaluable – A great way to improve best practices.”

– Bonnie Ponce, American Mathematical Monthly

“Our volume has increased so much in recent years. Recent upgrades to some of the automation at the end of the process (final disposition + initiating production) make a huge difference in our efficiency also fewer instances of user error.”

 

– Liz Guertin, ASCE

“EM Allows the ability to track incoming, invited submissions within the system so two databases do not need to be supported.”

– Claire Neumann, Clinical Infectious Diseases

“Editorial Manager saved time – faster turnaround time of editorial and review process.”

– Jenny Finnell, Assistant to the Editor-In-Chief, Synthetic Metals

“Editorial Manager has increasingly made my life simpler and more organized. I cannot imagine ever going back to the days before EM! Thank you for your innovative and responsive system.”

– Mary Newcomb, Managing Editor, Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

“We’re really enjoying the 3.0 EM upgrade. The staff who work on the journals we upgraded to 3.0 have been singing the praises of .zip file uploads for the last week!”

– Ryan Kelley, Local Applications Manager, Elsevier Publishing

“I have completed all the reviewer invitations for the current manuscripts, and I just love this system! I had absolutely no problems, everything worked great, and I kept catching on more and more as I used the system. Wow, this all makes my life so easy! It is terrific!”

– Peggy Chin, Editor, Advances in Nursing Science